The victim:
An argument could be made that Abel did society a favor.
Agreed. And the witness reports ever specify that the thug hit the fruit first.
Of course they say that Matthew was a “good kid” and very smart.
If he was a good kid WHY was he attacking another kid. And if he was smart was WHY he attacking a kid who was armed and indicated he was ready to kill?
Seems Matthew was just another ignorant thug.