About that “the science is settled” thing:
Science uses the scientific method, which requires controlled experiments with reproducible results.
It is impossible to conduct controlled climate experiments, much less obtain reproducible results, therefore climate science is not science.
Here are just a few previous examples of "settled science":
The Earth is flat.
The Earth is the center of the solar system.
Heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones.
Atoms are solid and indestructible.
Well put.
I find it almost comical that many in the church of AGW use the word, “science” almost as a Christian would use the word, Jesus. Science is, at the end of the day, a methodology used to test theories. And the results of those tests can be used to understand how things work as well as allow us to make things like steam engines and flat screen TV’s. But it is not science that gives us those things. Rather, it is what we learn from scientific experimentation that allows us the understanding necessary to conceive and build such things. Science is not really all that romantic. It’s fairly boring work.