[Seaplaner]

Controlling costs by limiting services (socialism/communism 101)

Oh, and who's surgeries will be unnecessary?

Might older folks (who remember Traditional America, American Values, and know best the fraud of the left) be likely candidates for ...

..."No surgery for you!".

[Steely Tom]

If somebody wants to build a coal-fired power plant hospital that does a lot of surgical procedures, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them,”

[Calvin Locke]

The Bamster once said ~”[his health care vision]...might mean that some people will have to take a pill instead of getting an operation...”

[sheana]

This article is all about Covered California. California’s version of Obamacare. When 1/3 of California’s population is on Medicare, how many do you think are Obamacare? Yeah, they’re gonna have to cut services. They’re figuring out you can’t give free or almost free healthcare to everyone.
This doesn’t bother me at all. It is happening just like we said it would.

[sheana]

Not Medicare. Medicaid, known as MediCal in California

Autocorrect strikes again.

[Jim Noble]

Controlling costs by limiting services

And what's your idea?

The US is $20 trillion-with a T in debt, largely from providing medical services that no one is paying for. This will not continue.

Either services will be limited, or taxation will go to the sky.

Right?