Because medication can't continue to be sold if there's a cure / vaccine.
“Because medication can’t continue to be sold if there’s a cure / vaccine.”
I’m actually starting to believe that there is an element of truth to this. I note that agood number of breakthroughs come from England where the cold calculus of cost/benefit rules.
No, it’s because most of the “cures” are hyped up by the researchers who are hoping to bring in investors to fund further development. Most drug prototypes turn out to be duds.
If cures were being withheld because there is more profit in treating the disease than in prevent ing it, then why do we have mandatory vaccinations? Why not just let kids get sick and hospitalize them for big profits?
Maybe true, but a completely inappropriate & insensitive remark here. Glioblastoma has no cure and there is no medicine to be sold. I know it took my dad.