“Send us money. We’ll take it.”
It’s all about raising funds for political action against Conservatives.
Teacher’s unions propose new rule,
all children are now non-voting union members
and must pay union dues.
Will the “community members” pay nearly $1000.00/year in dues—like the extortion extracted from educators?
This is the epitome of corruption, greed, and illegality of libtards. That union does next to nothing for its members. Its true purpose seems to be enriching the people who work for the union.
“It’s all for the children!”
Rinse. Repeat.
precious little representation of members!
but
a steady river of commie-pinko-leftist political propaganda in their “union newspaper”
... needs to be investigated....seriously... on BOTH accounts!
Two Words: Randi Weingarten! A Capo to head the NEA.
If I join the Union, would I receive the same benefits teachers get?
In the wife’s Midwest Inner-City School District, only aroundm9% of teachers are Union Members, a few years after”Right-to-work” came into effect. Given the choice, most do not see the benefit of paying the Union anymore.
This has tremendously affected financing for local Democrat Campaigns.
Too Damn bad.
In some areas the bus drivers are part of the teachers’ union ... pension and all ...
Exactly. The enabling legislation I think requires the members to share employers and/or job descriptions in common. Similar to credit unions.
Finally, we see what is going on at the NEA.
Less need for teachers and thus no one to pay into their pension fund.
Also explains why CA NEA is driving this.
They have had $$$ problems for a long time.