[bgill]

For all the money she’s spent on lawyers, she could have had someone come out with a machine that sees underground to determine if those are graves. IMO, those large flat stones look like tombstones. If they are, she hasn’t a leg to stand on. Evil woman.

[Sacajaweau]

We did GPR (ground penetrating radar) on our site. We also found the law that made it the responsibility of the Town.

[CaptainK]

Knick said she spent “many thousands” of dollars on the case before Pacific Legal Foundation, a firm described on its website as challenging “burdensome laws in courts and legislatures across the country,” took the case pro bono.

[Timmy]

Evil woman? For wanting to protect her property? I believe she is absolutely right. The government (local, state, or federal) cannt simply seize control of your property without compensation. It’s the very basis of liberty.

[IYAS9YAS]

For all the money she’s spent on lawyers, she could have had someone come out with a machine that sees underground to determine if those are graves. IMO, those large flat stones look like tombstones. If they are, she hasn’t a leg to stand on. Evil woman.

Seems to me the burden of proof for a cemetery being there is on the man who claims there is one.

Provide proof, not speculation. If ground-penetrating-radar is necessary to prove the existence of gravesites, the burden should also fall on the claimant. Why should the property owner, who had no prior knowledge of any cemetery, and was not informed of its existence at the time of sale, nearly 50 years ago, be out any money on this? Why should she be forced to provide access to something that may not be anything at all? No one has proven a cemetery is there.

[Balding_Eagle]

It’s her property, and yet you call her evil? Are you nuts?

SCOTUS will back me up this fall.