Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How a weakened ESPN became consumed by politics
WSJ via MSN ^ | 5/24/2018 | Shalini Ramachandran

Posted on 05/24/2018 11:43:50 AM PDT by T-Bird45

Link only due to MSN site however the entire WSJ article is there, no paywall.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cocaine; disney; espn; media; msm; race; sports
Good read - confirms a lot of what we discuss on FR, including quotes from known on-air persons. Sounds like a seething cauldron over there, especially for those who didn't get the big contracts to host a failing stinker (Get Up!)
1 posted on 05/24/2018 11:43:50 AM PDT by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
How a weakened ESPN became consumed by politics

Cause sports is boring, and there's nothing of substance one can say about it?

The only time I ever watch ESPN is when I'm at the barber shop. They have it on multiple screens, but (thankfully) with the sound turned down.

When I was in there last week for my spring haircut, I kept one eye on ESPN. They were doing a split screen debate of some sort, black guy on the left, white guy on the right.

After some minutes, I couldn't help but notice that the black guy was talking and talking and talking, and the white guy's role seemed to be to sit there, say nothing, and look chagrined. I'm really not exaggerating.

I have no clue what was the topic of discussion, and it obviously doesn't matter.

2 posted on 05/24/2018 11:49:02 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

My impression is that they felt that the golden ‘path’ would just continue on and they didn’t care if they lost 10-to-20 percent of their ‘clients’. I think they are closer to a 40-percent viewer loss if compared against a dozen years ago.

Churches are stumbling along the same path....becoming politicized and waking up to see a quarter of their congregation walking out.


3 posted on 05/24/2018 11:53:15 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Everything the Left touches, it destroys.


4 posted on 05/24/2018 12:24:23 PM PDT by skinndogNN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

I broke the FR Rules and read the article before posting. Anyway, it’s a pretty good article and discusses a lot of the dysfunction that’s killing ESPN. Some of the issues they touched on could be expanded upon. ESPN has been left-wing SJW political for some time, but until recently it didn’t matter because they were growing, not shrinking. Today, they are shrinking and while the politicization is part, it’s not all of it.

ESPN bought a lot of long-term contracts with escalating fee structures in the belief that the viewer numbers would continue to climb instead of declining. The reason the viewers are declining is related to four reasons.

1. The leagues are going around ESPN with their own on-line streaming packages to watch games live.

2. The leagues’ own websites feature better news and videos than do the ESPN Sportcenter shows. The consumer can chose the story they want to follow and the videos they want to watch on the website and not have it determined for them by SportsCenter.

3. The product the leagues themselves are selling has declined, particularly the NFL and NBA.

4. The 18-25 age demographic just doesn’t care about spectator sports. Particularly the left-wing members of that demographic. Courting them with their propaganda isn’t effective because they can get their lies from any of a number of other media outlets without having to suffer through the sports content they don’t care for.

All in all, ESPN went the path of stupid, and then repeatedly doubled down on it.


5 posted on 05/24/2018 12:25:51 PM PDT by henkster (Monsters from the Id.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
1. The leagues are going around ESPN with their own on-line streaming packages to watch games live.

About all I watch these day in sports is MLB (Astros) and the PGA. The ONLY time I watch a game on ESPN is if they are the only ones televising it. If the Astros channel (ATT Sports net) could show it simultaneously, I would not watch ESPN at all. The ESPN baseball coverage sucks.

6 posted on 05/24/2018 1:01:33 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: henkster

“The 18-25 age demographic just doesn’t care about spectator sports.”

This is probably the biggest challenge for many businesses. In times past this generation was coming into money for the first time and was ready to assume debt to start building families.

Now they already have debt from college and they are not looking to start families. Their generational motto should be: If it is not free it is not for me.


7 posted on 05/24/2018 1:22:37 PM PDT by vg0va3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vg0va3

A rational response to a point.

Why take on a huge financial risk (marriage if you’re a male, children if you are female) when you have no real “need”.


8 posted on 05/24/2018 1:50:36 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

My dad bought me stock in ESPN when Bill Rasmussen started it. It was started to broadcast UConn games and to broadcast Hartford Whalers games. I knew it would be a great network, and it was until Dizzy bought 80% of it from Getty. Dizzy (Disney) screw it up badly. I wish Dizzy would sell it to someone who would keep it for sports and Entertainment, not left wing political crap.


9 posted on 05/24/2018 1:52:56 PM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

It’s a story essentially about self-inflicted wounds.

Certain TV businesses, particularly sports related, have to decide what their primary purpose TO THEIR VIEWERS is, stick to it and not let other agendas be interjected into what they are supposedly serving their audience. In sports, politics can do nothing but divide.

Fans do not see their divisions over what teams or figures they admire, favor, or do not appreciate as relative to, or related to politics; until stupid sports talking heads and sports telecast executive start interjecting them into sports. ESPN took that bad route, among many other bad steps, and has been losing.


10 posted on 05/24/2018 2:13:35 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
Use to watch '1st Take' can't watch it anymore.

Anti Trump with Steve Smith and Max Kellermen and Molly.

11 posted on 05/24/2018 2:29:54 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vg0va3

Left wing college indroctnation and a failing public school system....


12 posted on 05/24/2018 4:30:04 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

It’s not just Disney-ESPN it’s the whole dadblamed wide world of sports like the NFL.

Rush Limbaugh was canned at ESPN for being too political.

The NFL refused Rush Limbaugh’s attempt to buy into a team (they don’t have to bake the cake apparently) because he supposedly wasn’t right for the game.

Marxist led protests are A-OK to these public welfare corporations that rape the public for billions in subsidies. Build me a stadium and then I GET THE MONEY FROM THE NAMING RIGHTS!

At least they’ve given up the lie that the billion dollar SuperBowl is a “non-profit” event.


13 posted on 05/25/2018 5:03:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ads for Chappaquiddick warn of scenes of tobacco use. What about the hazards of drunk driving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster
I notice that most young people (Millennials) don't seem to care too much about spectator sports. When I was in my 20s and starting to climb the career ladder, I used to buy a newspaper in the morning and read the sports pages before going into the office. That is because all the men in the office would be talking about the previous nights games and I wanted to be part of those conversations. These days, sports is hardly mentioned in the workplace at all except among us old timers.

My two grown sons couldn't care less about sports and that seems to be the norm for their generation.

I know ESPN became a large media company but I don't believe I've ever watched them. I've never been much of a cable-TV watcher and I cut the cable a few years back because pretty much anything I want to watch is available on Netflix or YouTube and that's all fine by me. If I want to watch a movie, I'll get it on demand.

14 posted on 05/25/2018 5:17:22 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Surprised no one has mentioned the annoying ESPN Insider feature where the “popular” articles/analyses require one to pay for a subscription.

Meanwhile Bleacher Report, once an attractive alternative to ESPN, now requires you to “sign in” with an email address or through Facebook.


15 posted on 05/25/2018 7:29:28 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson