Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trillian

It’s simple. They don’t believe their own information.

If they did believe lowering carbon emissions was so critical they would be demanding draconian cuts in carbon. Differnt light bulbs won’t do it. Solar panels on roofs won’t either.

To reduce carbon emissions to the level they claim is necessary, you would have to reduce the standard of living back to the 1800s. Carbon is only an excuse to pretend they are important.


6 posted on 05/22/2018 12:55:53 PM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

IF they believed their own BS, Al Gore wouldn’t own a massive seaside mansion. Leo Dicaprio wouldn’t fly around in private jets and ride in limos. James Cameron wouldn’t own a huge estate, fly in private jets, have a bunch of 4 wheel drive and off road vehicles etc etc etc.

Obviously they’re just virtue signalling hypocrites.


29 posted on 05/22/2018 1:51:41 PM PDT by FLT-bird (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke
To reduce carbon emissions to the level they claim is necessary, you would have to reduce the standard of living back to the 1800s.

At the very least they would have to give up their own houses, cars and electronics and live in an apartment near the entrance to the salt mine (salt would mined by hand). But since they are not, you are correct that they are not the least bit serious about reducing CO2. Control the masses, sure. Reduce CO2, not a chance.

43 posted on 05/22/2018 7:54:52 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson