“In other words, the employees were asking the Supreme Court to allow them to accept the terms of the employment agreement up front, and then decide to opt out when they don’t like the terms they agreed to, basically solely because it benefits them. To side with the employees in this case would have undermined the freedom of contract principle and allow the judicial branch to step in just because an employee got himself into a bad deal.
“That’s not how contract law should work, particularly under a constitutional analysis. This opinion highlights the basic difference in conservative versus liberal thinking of the proper role and function of the judicial branch under Article III. “
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/supreme-court-rules-that-contracts-mean-what-they-say
SCOTUS is going to have a hard time with this ruling someday when a clever employer inserts binding arbitration language that applies to sexual harassment or discrimination claims.