Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/17/2018 10:40:18 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

Is this the ex-post facto document that he and Rosie ginned up real quick like after he indicted Manafort for crap they knew about 5 years ago?


2 posted on 05/17/2018 10:41:57 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

hopefully in the interest of Transparency I hope the judge unseals the copy.

I wouldn’t of thought that Mueller can seal things on his own behalf without getting permission from the judge.


3 posted on 05/17/2018 10:43:04 AM PDT by Fhios (Mr. Magoo or Rip Van Sessions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Reuters terms it “wide-ranging”. Yeah, you might call it that. Twenty million dollars later we still don’t even have a crime. Twenty mil will, however, buy a lot of slime and innuendo, and it has.


4 posted on 05/17/2018 10:43:17 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

IIRC , the authorization was “verbal”. Now we have a back dated memo that will buy Meuller a few months. When will someone step up to these clowns?


6 posted on 05/17/2018 10:51:23 AM PDT by DrDude (Where's the Storm? Its not even raining yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Mule-heads team has already asserted that it doesn’t include super secret verbal directions


10 posted on 05/17/2018 11:03:29 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

But, I do have a question for FR....

When a prosecutor or law enforcement officer goes before a Grand Jury and provides testimony, they are sworn is (I’ve done quite a few times). Once done with the oath, you are giving sworn testimony, under penalty of, perjury. So, if it’s found out that you lied to the Grand Jury, you can be charged,indicted, and prosecuted for perjury.

You’re telling the citizens on that jury that you have done all the investigating that needed to be done and now you’d like them to decide if a crime was committed by whoever. You’re telling these citizens that you are an expert in the field. A subject matter expert and that you’re the person for the job. And you give them the reasons why you think “they” did it and all the other particulars of the case. You have done all the homework. You’ve dotted all the “I’s”, crossed all the “T’s”. Case is wrapped up. You

You went into the Grand Jury room and told the citizens on that jury that, this company, did this or that and what they did was illegal, under some federal code. But, then, you get caught getting an indictment for a company that didn’t exist. You went into a Grand Jury room and told them one thing, then you went into a courtroom and it’s discovered that the entity you indicted, wasn’t even a real company at the time of your ‘in-depth’ investigation, completed by the finest investigators and lawyers, around.

Did the laywer(s), from the Special Counsel, commit Perjury?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/30556/disaster-mueller-indicted-russian-company-didnt-ryan-saavedra


11 posted on 05/17/2018 11:14:27 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Why is the memo even secret? It alleges to be an attempt to set the scope of an investigation into whether Russia interfered in the 2016 election and if the Trump campaign knowingly assisted or coordinated that effort. The scope of the investigation shouldn’t be secret (some of the investigation might need to be secret, but not the scope of the investigation). RELEASE THE MEMO.


21 posted on 05/17/2018 11:47:38 AM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Lets hope the judge gets on with bringing some “justice” into matters.

Its hard for me to see that lately down in the swampland.

But I guess I need to cool it for now and see what Judge Ellis comes up with.

A Republican appointed judge I understand and one might think he would like to correct Democrat judge’s games disguised as justice.


24 posted on 05/17/2018 3:02:55 PM PDT by Spiridon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
there should be drafts and the original copy on Rosenswines pc and DOJ backups then, right???

lets contrast and compair

25 posted on 05/17/2018 3:20:18 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Because gangsters never destroy evidence!


31 posted on 05/17/2018 5:15:44 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson