Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2018 6:06:33 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MarvinStinson

Someone tell Shep.


2 posted on 05/10/2018 6:16:40 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

I strongly suspect Trump loves this part of the job. How many times did he see our government involved in agreements with foreign entities, who not only did not comply with their end, but openly, and gleefully did not comply while showing their bare behinds to the USA while grinning from ear to ear as they slapped their butts! Rubbing it in, treating us like the chumps they viewed us to be.

As a private US citizen with dealings overseas, he saw this, as he describes in his 187 interview with Larry King.

As President, he is in a position now to have a say in, and power over that...I’ll bet he loves it.


3 posted on 05/10/2018 6:20:20 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

“...contradicting statements by U.S. intelligence officials that Tehran was in compliance with the now-jettisoned accord...”

Anyone still following and/or researching the involvement of US intelligence in the Trump investigation should find that statement above particularly disturbing.

I don’t know where we go from here, but clearly US intelligence actions meet the definition of “traitorous.”

The overarching question being whether those “statements” were coerced by the former administration and its agency heads rather than a collective failure of our intelligence apparatus to protect this country...


4 posted on 05/10/2018 6:21:04 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Moot point:

State Department says Iran NEVER SIGNED nuclear deal and it’s not ‘legally binding’ as it tells Congress to butt out of Obama’s ‘political commitments’

By J. Taylor Rushing, U.s. Political Reporter, For Dailymail.com17:46 EDT 25 Nov 2015, updated 18:50 EDT 25 Nov 2015

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3334249/State-Department-says-Iran-NEVER-SIGNED-nuclear-deal-s-not-legally-binding-tells-Congress-butt-Obama-s-political-commitments.html


5 posted on 05/10/2018 6:30:01 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

Did Obama’s Deal say Iran could attack Israel when ever it didn’t get it’s way


6 posted on 05/10/2018 6:57:57 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MarvinStinson

I thought it was common knowledge that Iran had secret sites that no one could get near.
Now all we hear is Iran is in compliance with a treaty that is an ‘understanding letter’ at best.


8 posted on 05/10/2018 7:10:57 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson