Her Wikipedia page was written by her opposition.
“Her Wikipedia page was written by her opposition.”
Wikileaks has been absent from the social media censorship discussion. Snopes, too. Yet a great many people are aware that content there is censored and biased.
I just want honesty on such sites (FR included): mostly, a very noticeable home page statement of political, religious and/or social preference, support or intent. Truth in labeling, just like with food.
Jim makes it plain here: “Established in 1996, Free Republic is one of the earliest and largest online gathering places for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We’re working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!”