The supposed time line of the events don’t show a long period of time during the event.
http://www.phillyvoice.com/philadelphia-starbucks-rashon-nelson-donte-robinson-black-men-arrested/
• 4:35 p.m. - Nelson and Robinson arrive at the Starbucks 10 minutes early for
a business meeting. Nelson immediately asks to use the restroom but is told its
only for paying customers. He sits down with Robinson and the manager comes
over to ask if they want anything, they explain they’re fine and are just waiting
for their friend.
• 4:37 p.m. - Police are called.
•4:41 p.m. - Officers arrive.
The facts have yet to be vetted in an open forum. In addition to the time line, we need to know what was said during the time line. So far, we have heard little about the manager’s side of the story. As in Charlottsville, the left got its side of the story out first.
I don’t see where this timeline came from.
It “seems” unrealistic. TWO MINUTES and you call the police?
Not credible.
I hope she sues. Surveillance video would show the REAL timeline.
The one perp said TWICE that he was cuffed and “double locked”.
Who says this? Twice even?
Obviously said to try to infuriate ignorant people who are unaware of what “double locked” is.
“The basic mechanism of a double lock involves a catch which, when engaged, checks the movement of the ratchet wheel to prevent it from tightening further.”
If you are cuffed, you WANT them “double locked”.
(For a real education watch “LIVE PD”).
We know what the two men said, but I would like to know what the Starbucks security cameras show regarding their time of arrival. If the manager really did call the cops within 2 minutes of the arrival of these two after almost no interaction with them (according to them), what is her side of the story?