She was part of a set up - that’s what that meeting was.
No kidding. That doesn’t mean she shouldn’t be interviewed by investigators, as thoroughly as possible. Even if every sentence she utters is a lie, one can learn from what stories she tries to tell. Misdirection And deception can tell stories beyond what the perp intends. And she might let slip some real info, whether by accident or on purpose. What part of “thorough investigation” do some ppl find hard to grasp?