I don’t place any kind of “faith” in her... I simply want to know what she knows, or what she may “pretend” to know, etc. Even with an agent, sometimes much can be learned from what stories they tell, what they want you to believe etc.
I have no regard for her, as you seem to assume. I simply want to KNOW what really happened, and especially why she in particular dismisses the dossier. You seem to assume you know all. I want to know more.
If she were testifying FOR the value of the dossier, of course, that would be worthless as she could simply be spouting on orders. But the fact that she is taking such a strong stance against the dossier is interesting.