So now what? It’s predictable that Starbucks will become a target for loitering.
They will.not be able to do anything about loitering, even if homeless folks decide to camp out.
This is funny on another level, because Starbucks prides itself as a company, for support of liberal causes. But in this case, they have offended the sensibilities of blacks, a key grievance group.
They can spin all they want. It is still the left attacking the left. From what I witness in Starbucks, they hire counter culture, tattoo and ring wearing employees. It’s not hard to imagine what their political slant is.
I feel compelled to correct that egregious error of adult judgement.
Starbucks prides itself... for support of liberal causes, by overpricing their customers' drinks without their consent.
Their customers support their virtue signalling scam...
The only way I would ever think about returning is if they reduce their prices across the board by 30%; and let me choose the charities I support.
I suspect they have a boatload of fewer customers today, I among them.
The fatal irony is that my (now) ex local Starbucks already had loitering OUTSIDE. I could help or ignore them; my choice.
Homeless would come in all the time; they were polite, didn't smell the place up and it never bothered me one iota, ever. All they ever asked for was water.
Outside, I once had professional (young druggy) semi-homeless, ask me if she could borrow my cell phone to call a taxi. I agreed to help but when she "dialed" and began talking it was obvious she was NOT talking to a taxi company, I asked for my phone back, said "sorry" and went on my way, end of forgotten story.
I would not have enjoyed the experience inside the store, specially with a loud "entitled" thug.
I say Conservatives wearing pro-NRA and pro-life shirts with MAGA hats on should take up Starbucks offer and sit in their shops all day, buying nothing.