Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PJ-Comix

Projection is when you accuse your opponent of doing exactly what you are doing.

And now we see that turned around. Everything the Democrats threw at Trump is going to boomerang right back at them. We know all their tricks. They told us exactly what they were doing.


2 posted on 04/21/2018 6:21:06 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

They are flopping around like a fish out of water.


3 posted on 04/21/2018 6:24:17 AM PDT by Don Corleone ( lose the gun. save the cannolis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
The Clintons perfected “projection.”
4 posted on 04/21/2018 6:26:25 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Projection is when you accuse your opponent of doing exactly what you are doing.”.........

It’s written as Rule #1 in the demodummies play book.


17 posted on 04/21/2018 6:59:58 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy; All

I’ve kept up closely with this whole matter. This suit boils down to the basic allegation that the Trump campaign, the Russian government, and Wikileaks conspired to have the Russian intelligence services hack the DNC, transfer the hacked emails to Wikileaks, and have Wiki publish them, thereby damaging the Witch’s campaign. So far there only appear to be two pieces of “evidence” to support this:

1) the DNC-commissioned Crowdstrike evaluation of the DNC servers that purports to have found “proof of Russian hacking” and

2) one or more statements in Steel Dossier that that say the Russians hacked the DNC.

The problems with 1) is are that the DNC refused to let the FBI examine its servers, Crowdstrike was the DNC’s contractor, Assange has denied the Russians provided the information, and the only present outside analysis that’s been done concluded the data transfer rates were so high that the extractions could only have been done internally. Item 2), the Steele Dossier, is even worse because its allegations are inadmissible third hand hearsay, at best.

In short that leaves the DNC with zero, zip, nada evidence to support this suit.


21 posted on 04/21/2018 7:19:45 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson