Jonathan Parrett
Joseph Goebbels
This article really points out how silly the “Climate Change / Restoration / Whatever” propaganda has become. Species that compete are always going to deal with any natural or evolutionary change better than a species that doesn’t have to compete. But now they add the “climate change” gloss to it as if its something new and relevant to making people believe the Climate Change BS.
Competition between males improves resilience against climate change ... true as long as all males concerned get the same prize, after which they would need to take some training on sexism and the feminine way, while shoveling 6 inches of snow in the middle of April ...
Well I guess that leaves liberal beta males out in the cold.
If the males are resilient, is this another way of saying “affects women and children most”?
It is truly unbelievable what passes for a PhD these days.
With its depleted female population, the Chinese will survive us without any doubt...
Junk Science Daily.
Climate change and this article are all based on the religion of evolution.
“Animal species with males who compete intensively for mates might be more resilient to the effects of climate change”
In which animal species do the males not intensively compete for the girls?
“Climate change is altering environments all over the world in a variety of ways, with increases in temperature of several degrees being likely in many places.”
What BS. I’ve lived in the same place for 50 years and the climate is essentially the same.
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here