Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmarterJr; rktman; tomkat
Just today I read about the latest study that showed that computer models exaggerated by as much as 45% the impact of CO2 on global atmospheric temperatures.

Money quote: "The resulting warming [under the status quo] would be below the target set at the Paris agreement."

Oh really? This whole multi-billion-dollar scam, even if cranked up to the max, would deliver "results" not effectively different than what's trending now?

Oh, good.

Now we can breathe again.

Folks, CO2 is not a pollutant. It's an atmospheric fertilizer. If it increased threefold it would bring us up much closer to the optimal levels they aim for in greenhouses. You know: to produce lush plant growth.

The ordinary, lifegiving process of organic decompositon produces robust amounts of the choicest of greenhouse gases: methane, water vapor, and CO2. I'm gonna take my life in my hands and triple my compost pile.

Greenhouse optimization, here we come!

9 posted on 04/26/2018 7:15:51 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts." - Sgt. Joe Friday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
.. and triple my compost pile

Yep, pile it on & pile it high .. the Erf and all us creatures thank you in advance !

10 posted on 04/26/2018 7:29:33 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson