Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2018 5:21:09 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BBell

North Korea thinks if the US troops go they can march in as Liberators ,LOL


2 posted on 04/15/2018 5:26:02 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

South Korea is a top 5 world economy. They are no longer starving and destitute. If they cannot defend themselves from the starving and destitute North they don’t deserve to be free. They even have well developed indigenous military arms and munitions industry and make their own tanks, ships, and some ordinance.

The US could use those troops on the Southern border.


3 posted on 04/15/2018 5:27:02 PM PDT by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell; All

It’s brilliant that Trump put a US withdraw on the table in these talks.

It’s a BENEFIT to us, forces Japan and So Korea to defend themselves (and they are eminently capable), and gives Norklandia something to crow about. It’s even of benefit to China in their weird calculus.

And he makes it look like we’re giving something up.


5 posted on 04/15/2018 5:34:30 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

If you read the article, there’s a good chance, particularly as NK sees it, that Lucy Van Pelt is the US and Charlie Brown is Qaddafi, Saddam Hussein, or Ukraine. I’d add the Kurds.


9 posted on 04/15/2018 5:42:33 PM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Why not? Germany did okay reuniting with East Germany. A strong, united Korea might be the best way to stop Chinese expansion.


12 posted on 04/15/2018 5:44:30 PM PDT by grania (President Trump, stop believing the Masters of War!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Yup, the terms should be ALL American and the troops stay as long as WE need them to. Norkers dictate NOTHING.


13 posted on 04/15/2018 5:45:35 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Bolton will only accept an agreement with unfettered access and the loading of cargo ships with dismantled parts.

Your .gif is outdated. It only exemplifies clinton, bush and obama.


17 posted on 04/15/2018 5:54:00 PM PDT by Eddie01 (I learned it on FreeRepublic.com, same as you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

It’s protection from the war mongering deep state they should be seeking.


18 posted on 04/15/2018 5:59:50 PM PDT by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
If the North does denuclearize, then the United States should bring home its forces as a matter of course. If proposing withdrawal would be useful in achieving denuclearization, then the card should be played during negotiations. After all, the overriding objective is to eliminate a potential North Korean attack on the American homeland.

The author's suggestion exemplifies the utter stupidity of diplomats and their perfect record of failing to prevent war and conflict. Pulling US forces out of the Korean peninsula simply because a brutal totalitarian regime "agrees" to give up the nuclear weapons it previously agreed to never produce is madness. It would set a humiliating precedent for the developed world and incentivize every tyrannical despot to build their own nuclear program so that it could be later traded away along with any limitation on their plans for future militaristic expansion. Most third graders could formulate better policy than this fatally naive proposal.

22 posted on 04/15/2018 6:04:35 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Reunification is the best outcome..and the one least in China’s interest.


24 posted on 04/15/2018 6:17:03 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Anyone who puts any faith at all in anything whatsoever said by North Korean leaders is, quite simply, a fool. End of story.


25 posted on 04/15/2018 6:33:05 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Utter foolishness. The U.S. troops essentially acting as hostages are the only ultimately keeping N. Korea from again invading the South. With them there, the U.S. must retaliate. With them gone, the North would be in control of Seoul before anybody could do anything.


26 posted on 04/15/2018 6:36:24 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

And a carrier battle group and Oregon...

Little early to be talking demilitarizing the Koreas LOL!
Denuclearizing is a good start.


28 posted on 04/15/2018 6:41:29 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
Moreover, President Trump’s behavior does not give confidence that he would keep his word.

Stopped reading right there. More libertarian caca.

29 posted on 04/15/2018 6:47:20 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Thankfully Trump will do what Trump thinks will work best and this author will continue to write articles that very few people read.


34 posted on 04/15/2018 7:45:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

That would leave South Korea being invaded by North Korea, China and Russia. It has also been one of the few issues that most united China and Russia in the past.

It might work, though, if South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines have new enough nuclear weapons. [To answer a funny proposition with another one.] Bandow should study some history and get off of the weed.


39 posted on 04/16/2018 1:41:20 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

It would be nice, though, if there were a realistic way to work it out without being pushed to eventually nuking a couple of expansionist nations.


40 posted on 04/16/2018 1:42:44 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

I’d love this just to see the expressions on the faces of the Koreans who say that the US is keeping them from peaceful unification.


45 posted on 04/16/2018 5:06:47 AM PDT by stellaluna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

“Instead, Kim could demand more from the administration—most likely the end of Washington’s alliance with the South and removal of U.S. troops from the peninsula.”

Trump, don’t be stupid. That has always been the strategic policy goal of North Korean dictators - get the U.S.-South Korean alliance to disband itself. Why? Once that happens, the North will not need any threat of nukes to attack South Korea. The overall program of North Korea remains the same - forced reunification of all Korea under terms suitable to the regime in North Korea retaining control.


46 posted on 04/16/2018 7:52:19 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson