Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armitage admits leaking Plame's identity (for those in the media that conveniently don't remember)
cnn.com ^ | 9/8/16

Posted on 04/13/2018 12:38:24 PM PDT by cotton1706

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage acknowledged Thursday that he was the source who first revealed the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak back in 2003, touching off a federal investigation. Armitage told the CBS Evening News that he did so inadvertently.

"I feel terrible," Armitage said. "Every day, I think, I let down the president. I let down the secretary of state. I let down my department, my family, and I also let down Mr. and Mrs. Wilson."

In a column published on July 14, 2003, Novak, citing two senior administration officials, noted that Plame was a CIA operative. The column was primarily about Plame's husband, Joe Wilson, a former career diplomat and critic of the intelligence underlying the invasion of Iraq.

Novak has never revealed the original source of the information about Plame. However, he has confirmed that President Bush's chief political strategist, Karl Rove, confirmed the information and was the second source cited in the column.

Novak has said he would not reveal the identity of the original source unless the source came forward. However, he said Fitzgerald learned who the source was independently.

Last month, sources told CNN that Armitage had revealed Plame's role at the CIA in a casual conversation with Novak.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: armitage; cialeak; elections; plame; plamegame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: gloryblaze

Plame and Stormy: Birds of a feather.


21 posted on 04/13/2018 2:17:28 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
i thought the husband leaked it in the Who's Who blurb...
22 posted on 04/13/2018 2:49:41 PM PDT by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Libby never served time in prison. GWB commuted that part of his sentence. Libby did pay a huge fine.


23 posted on 04/13/2018 3:27:00 PM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Yes, Wilson was very vocal about it in Washington conversations. The investigation was phony from Day One.


24 posted on 04/13/2018 3:48:53 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

They wanted Libby to lie against Cheney.

They want Cohen to lie against Trump.

Libby and Cohen are strictly victimized traps for bigger fish.

Rule of law says it misses the good old days.


25 posted on 04/13/2018 3:52:45 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

She was not deep cover. She was nominal cover, meaning her story was a thin vener and would not stand harsh scrutiny.

Besides she broke her own cover, or her husband did, before this.


26 posted on 04/13/2018 5:33:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Every day she drove down GW Parkway, pulled into Langley, and parked in the CIA HQ lot. If she were “undercover,” then she sucked real bad at it.


27 posted on 04/13/2018 5:37:34 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
-- Libby spent almost three years in prison ... --

Ummmm, no.

28 posted on 04/13/2018 5:40:25 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kevao

Yup. When you are under cover you are not anywhere near the HQ building.


29 posted on 04/13/2018 6:40:43 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

He did. He blew her nominal (ie thin) cover.


30 posted on 04/13/2018 6:41:23 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Wikipedia’s facts were as I remembered them.

I did not see evidence of a political bias in the information.

There are other sources as well that coould have been used.


31 posted on 04/13/2018 8:07:32 PM PDT by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson