Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flaming Conservative

I don’t think one has to be under oath to run afoul of “lying to a Federal agent” law as long as the questioners identify themselves as Fed agents. As for Samantha Power, it was not that she was lying or telling the truth, she may very well have been telling the truth and she probably was. But the implication of her stating that someone else forged her signature on the FISA unmasking requests is absolutely damning. It’s even more damning if she *was* telling the truth in my non-lawyer opinion. But nobody at the hearing where she stated that seemed to pick up on that or assign any sort of importance to the implication.


56 posted on 04/11/2018 7:30:24 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Good post.


57 posted on 04/11/2018 7:40:50 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson