Replies

RE: So why did they delete the article?

It is a mystery. According to the author... it is at this point, impossible to know why the Post pulled the story without comment. Has Nader turned into a major witness with pay dirt? If so (and I consider this unlikely), did Mueller’s team call up the Post and ask it to make embarrassing details about their star witness disappear? That seems heavy-handed, unethical, and counter-productive in the long run. In fact, it is hard to believe.

So, the other major possibility seems to be that this witness has turned out to be a nothingburger, an embarrassment to the investigators. But if so, how did the WaPo get the message that the article is an inconvenience and take the unusual action od deep-sixing it?

That seems heavy-handed, unethical, and counter-productive in the long run. In fact, it is hard to believe.

Kind of like searching Manaford's storage locker, then getting a warrant after the fact. That kind of unethical?

#5 re “how did the WaPo get the message that the article is an inconvenience and take the unusual action of deep-sixing it”?

The FBI/DOJ has more leaks that the Titanic, Lusitania, and USS Panay all combined and they leak towards the WP and NY Times like water going towards the ocean.

Never let it be said that the Wash. Post has any commitment to the Truth, Objectivity, or America.