If Trump was a woman. And a writer/commentator. He would be Ann Coulter.
It is sometimes hard to tell on FR nowadays whether I'm just supposed to reflexively tribe-up on one side or the other of an article's subject. Or whether it is still OK to actually listen to the provided link and discuss the content.
I listened. Ann, as usual, was entertaining, educational and right. If Ann is anti-Trump it is only in the sense that she is emphatically more pro-Trumpism than is Trump lately. Specifically regarding the dang ghost wall.
I wish our side in general was more like Ann. Those who love the man more than the mission will tend to spare the rod and spoil the politician. Those true to the mission will occasionally need to use, to quote Ann in the content linked, "tough love" on the politicians they favor. When they are drifting.
Ann wants Trump to succeed in building the dang wall. She makes the case that he CAN, right now. She lays out a great deal of wall-preventing details regarding the awful budget bill Trump just signed with very little fuss on his part.
Ann is simply saying to Trump EXACTLY what Trump would say to Ann if their roles were reversed.
I hold out hope that Trump actually is as smart as we hope he is, in which case I'd assume he EXPECTS believers in the mission to be very public and vocal about displeasure with the stagnant pace of wall-building efforts. As opposed to making excuses for impotence in some misguided and unhealthy sense of personal loyalty to man over mission.
Ann is right. Trump promised to build a wall. He said he’d make Mexico pay for it. We are well over one year into the Trump presidency, and as of now there is no wall, and not much progress has been made to start one.
> If Trump was a woman. And a writer/commentator. He would be Ann Coulter. <
Interesting analysis there. And you might be right. Both of them call it the way they see it, without regard for the consequences. And both of them drive the liberals absolutely crazy.