Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China tests driverless tanks that could be powered by artificial intelligence
South China Morning Post / Global Times ^ | Wednesday, 21 March, 2018 | Ma Jun and Shi Liufeng

Posted on 03/20/2018 10:20:16 PM PDT by texas booster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: ProtectOurFreedom

“It’s safe to say you can program the exact opposite of Uber vehicles.”

Well, not the -exact- opposite :)

Uber is a transportation where the passenger pays the maximum amount they can, the driver makes the least amount they can, and there is still a serious risk to both.

When I was young I drove pizzas around town. My dad didn’t like that risk, and I worked in the richest towns in Fairfield county, CT. I can only imagine the tension now.


41 posted on 03/21/2018 5:02:02 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

That was a great game!


42 posted on 03/21/2018 5:14:12 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Sure. Given experience with “artificial intelligence,” they might want to rethink that.


43 posted on 03/21/2018 5:16:21 AM PDT by I want the USA back (There are two sexes: male (pronoun HE), and female (pronoun SHE). Denial of this is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back; texas booster

44 posted on 03/21/2018 5:20:58 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

the tanks eventually staged a coup and were put down by one student with an umbrella


45 posted on 03/21/2018 5:58:18 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

aggressive intelligent weapons.

I’ve seen that movie, it doesn’t end well.


46 posted on 03/21/2018 7:02:44 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Marine Armor tried that some years ago at 29 Palms.

The big glitch was terrain. Human eyes can still see depth and terrain better than any video feed. The tanks kept getting stuck or tracks damaged by rugged terrain. An overwatch was used but still missed critical terrain features.

When the way forward is uncertain, controlled driving will be slower. Slow means dead.

A human driver can blend 3D vision with speed judgement.


47 posted on 03/21/2018 8:57:36 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

You can now get stereoscopic video rigs from the commercial telepresence industry that just about replicate said vision, something not an option back then.


48 posted on 03/22/2018 5:15:30 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

How does any new video technology work in dust and fog?

Humans have 3D vision and the judgement to quickly seek better driving terrain that computers will never have.


49 posted on 03/23/2018 11:08:48 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Um, you can get stereoscopic camera arrays now, which means you can get 3D video for humans doing remote piloting or for computers.


50 posted on 03/23/2018 11:25:59 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I have no doubt that vision technology will continue to excel.

My point is that it’s the judgement that comes from drivers that see, hear, and feel the movement of any vehicle in rough terrain is what is needed to effectively use armor.

Making choices about where to drive has to be done very quickly, some times intuitively. Computers and remote operators don’t do that very well on rough terrain.

That is what is fatal with armored warfare.


51 posted on 03/23/2018 2:00:21 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson