To: jimfree
So, since I studied constitutional and administrative law we may be revisiting what constitutes a regulatory taking.
Or, as history as shown over and over again, the U.S. Supreme Court, as is it's norm in Property "Takings" cases, will probably find someway to side with the government.
They'll find some reason to find for the "common good."
12 posted on
03/20/2018 7:42:48 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
They'll find some reason to find for the "common good."With a Hillary court it surely would. Hoping for a tilt back to the center and a finding of a regulatory taking requiring compensation. We shall see.
16 posted on
03/21/2018 3:19:56 AM PDT by
jimfree
(My17 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson