This has now crossed the line into farce.
CC
That’s only true if a racist says it to another racist with a different shade of epidermis.
In california, anyone who ISN’T a latino, preferably “undocumented,” is considered a racist.
Just ask moonbeam, batshit crazy pelosi, obama wannbe kamala harris, de leon the la raza peon, mad maxine, or xavier the reconquista cheerleader. All of these mexican government lackeys will tell you to your face that mexican socialism is superior to the Constitution, and all of you gringos need to go away.
I thought they had already banned any word with "man" in it.
Hey white people..
Only by saying you are racist can you be considered non-racist..you racist honkey.
“I’m a racist he’s a racist she’s a racist we’re all racist wouldn’t you like to be a racist too” HOWDYA LIKE ME NOW SNOWFLAKES?
When a white person self-identifies as black, does that mean that (insert appropriate pronoun here) is no longer a racist?
I am sure I never used that phrase.
Saying it implies you care what someone else thinks about it and you, not smart to do. (It might mean you think you ARE a racist too.)
I have said kiddingly many times that I am a sexist.
"We, the People" must be equipped to distinguish and between the principles that would keep America free and prosperous and the false premises that will enslave her. We must also be able to articulate them.
Accommodating tyranny by failing to call it what it is is dangerous. We have needed a leader whose words are strong and courageous and based in the principles of our Declaration of Independence--someone who is willing to put those principles into effect so that citizens actually can see them at work improving their lives.
American citizens have needed to wake up to the counterfeit ideas and false "hopes" offered by so-called Progressive (regressive) politicians who use "promises," just as the rest of us use "currency."
They buy votes with "promises" in order to gain power to themselves and their ilk. Then, when "hopes" are dashed, "the people" they have promised to help (the naive, the poor, the ignorant--even the "educated" who are ignorant of liberty vs. tyranny) find themselves enslaved, working for those who have purchased their power in the most despicable manner--by offering "hope and change." Thus it has ever been.
The people who founded America were not so "dumbed down." Hear two of them:
"It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of citizens and one of the noblest characteristics of the Revolution. The freemen of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle [usurpation of power] and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much . . . to forget it." - James Madison
" . . . nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers, and destroyers press upon them so fast, that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the encroachment upon the American constitution is such, as to grow every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every hour. The revenue creates pensioners, and the penshioners urge for more revenue. The people grow less steady, spirited, and virtuous, the seekers more numerous and more corrupt, and every day increases the circles of their dependents and expectants, until virtue, integrity, public spirit, simplicity, and frugality, become the objects of ridicule and scorn, and vanity, lusury, foppery, selfishness, meanness and downright venality swallow up the whole society." - John Adams
Further, it was not just the founding leaders who were well-informed about their constitution and approaching threats to its protections. By the Year 1830, when the French jurist Alexis de Tocqueville traveled America, he wrote admiringly of the citizenry, observing that even the backwoodsman was far more well-read and informed than those in other parts of the world, and that they understood their Constitution, and had with them a Bible and a newspaper. (Must be where Obama got the idea that those who objected to "redistribution and change" were 'clinging to their guns and Bibles') Sadly, beginning in the mid-20th Century, our Progressive-controlled "government" schools removed the ideas of liberty from the nation's textbooks, largely under the guise of a counterfeit idea of "separation of church and state," and the citizenry is uninformed as to the difference between tyranny and liberty.
Today, with all modern means of communication, many Americans continue to possess little understanding of threats to their liberty and, thus, risk losing it to charlatan Progressives whose only goal is mediocrity, power and control of "We, the People."
What would they do with a T-Shirt that has, “I don’t give a F%&$ about your feelings!”?
btt
Liberals are too stupid to Know that calling someone a racist is racist.
Liberals are too stupid to Know that calling someone a racist is racist.
So if you’re not into black chicks, and you don’t swipe right on them on Tinder, is that also a microaggression?
What about fat chicks? Homosexual men?
I just want to know what I’m supposed to do, and who I’m supposed to be attracted to.
So.. cant verbally defend oneself from being called a racist?
Ok. Just punch the reply then.
I fart in UC’ s general direction.
5.56mm
I agree. The word, “racist” is racist. Think about it.
“A Bias-Free Language Guide posted on the University of New Hampshire website also asserted that the word American is problematic because it assumes the U.S. is the only country inside [the continents of North and South America]. “
So therefore calling oneself Asian or European would also be problematic.
These people are NUTS!
.
It’s the “have black friends” part that sounds a little racist. I’m not sure why. But the headline should quote it correctly.