I got a different vibe. Take for argument's sake that Russians attempted to interfere with the elction process. Say they managed to get some opinion pieces published, or influenced the content of them; or that they were colluding directly with the DEMs.
It doesn't necessarily foloow that the effort was a big deal as to ramifications. Only that there was an effort. The press studiously avoids the "how substantial were the ramifications" question, and leaps directly to "the ramifications were substantial."
I thought he did an excellent job supporting Trump's NK success.
Soros continues to fund unrest throughout the world too.
The Democrats bow down and kiss the Soros ring, in exchange for funding. The Obama and Hillary ties to Russia are ignored. Maybe Hillary has new FBI files on lots of people.
She sure deleted lots of stuff never revealed. The media cannot report the real news, for fear of retaliation.
I thought he was good...