Replies

To: Jed Eckert

Hand guns are already at 21 years of age. If that is considered constitutional (it isn't) I don't see why this suit would prevail.

3 posted on 03/09/2018 4:09:43 PM PST by NutsOnYew (If the world was perfect, it wouldn't be.)

To: NutsOnYew

Yup - oh and you also cannot buy tobacco products as well til you’re 21.

The new law extends the current purchase age limit to include rifles as well as guns.

5 posted on 03/09/2018 4:12:09 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))

To: NutsOnYew

Hand guns are already at 21 years of age. If that is considered constitutional (it isn't) I don't see why this suit would prevail.

Valid point. However, I don't think the handgun law was ever challenged all the way up to the Supreme Court. I could be mistaken.

17 posted on 03/09/2018 4:33:48 PM PST by Jed Eckert

To: NutsOnYew

Because you could buy a rifle or shotgun at 18. Now that they’re all at 21, it is infringing on the right to bear arms.

61 posted on 03/09/2018 7:07:23 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")

To: NutsOnYew

It’s 21 in my state

129 posted on 03/10/2018 11:25:34 AM PST by RetiredArmy (We are in the Last Days of human history. Jesus is coming back, & soon! Do U know Him?)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794