>>It does not appear falsifiable.<<
Find a modern horse skeleton at the Jurassic era strata.
I am not going to refight the CRevo wars here.
I just post to let lurkers know there are people here who DO know science.
Feel feel to post from the science version of CRacked magazine.
I have weighed in and my argument is unassailable.
+1
I challenge any of the Creationist to find a Stone Age era kangaroo skeleton between the mid-East and Australia. They won’t. No kangaroos on the Arc.
“Feel feel to post from the science version of CRacked magazine.”
I did not post anything pro or con.
I do note you moved to perjorative language, instead of posting evidence.
I pointed out that you made an assertion without facts, indicating bias or pre-belief.
Evidence for your view would demonstrate incremental development of the type of vision the mantis has.
If you have such evidence, please post it. If not, OK.
Well. I guess that's the end of scientific discovery. Freedumb2003 has weighed in, we can all go home now.
“Find a modern horse skeleton at the Jurassic era strata.”
Bad example.
A modern horse is the product of artificial selection, aka selective breeding.
It is unlikely that any modern horse, including wild horses, were not descendants of horses domesticated at one point or another.
So how does the lack of domesticated features in Jurassic fossils support TToE?