Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73

The whole purpose of the clause was to give the Congress a way to prevent the States from using their regulatory powers in ways to the detriment citizens of other States.

It wasn’t even about making rules to govern the activities of private Persons or privately held entities as they sought to engage in commerce among the several States, for those doing so would still be covered by the Laws of all the States they were conducting business in when they were doing business within them.


126 posted on 03/07/2018 3:46:00 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne

>
The whole purpose of the clause was to give the Congress a way to prevent the States from using their regulatory powers in ways to the detriment citizens of other States.
>

Strike Citizens and I believe we’re on the same page.

What it DOESN’T mean is *controlling* every aspect of interstate commerce.

Much like the interstate road system, the States may have an overseer (everyone agrees/plays by same set of rules), but they don’t need/require a Lord.


132 posted on 03/08/2018 5:02:12 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson