[libertylover]

I’m surprised they are not demanding full repeal of 2nd Amendment.

They have no intention of trying to repeal the 2nd Amendment. They want judges who will just rule that it doesn't apply because it is "out of date".

[laplata]

They have no intention of trying to repeal the 2nd Amendment. They want judges who will just rule that it doesn’t apply because it is “out of date”.

><

And those judges will find out they’d better hunker down in deep bunkers.

[SkyPilot]

They have no intention of trying to repeal the 2nd Amendment. They want judges who will just rule that it doesn't apply because it is "out of date".

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/23/politics/supreme-court-heller-thomas-2nd-amendment/index.html

"The lower courts are resisting this court's decision" in Heller, Thomas complained, "and are failing to protect the 2nd Amendment to the same extent that they protect other constitutional rights." The 69-year-old justice also turned to his own colleagues on the bench bemoaning the fact that there haven't been the necessary four votes to take up a major 2nd Amendment related case since Heller. "If a lower court treated another right so cavalierly, I have little doubt that this court would intervene," Thomas said. "The 2nd Amendment is a disfavored right in this court."

Justice Thomas is correct. States and lower courts have enacted scores of unconstitutional laws restricting gun ownership and violating the 2nd Amendment.

The Supreme Court reacts by punting on first down, and refuses to hear the cases.

But they wouldn't dare place an "Undue Burden" on a woman who wants to murder her child in the 9th month of pregnancy.

We live in an age of unprecedented duplicity and evil.