So do I. But I am having trouble seeing any justification, 3-D chess notwithstanding, for the following:
1) Him (apparently) planning to issue an EO to ban bump stocks
2) His comment: Take the guns first, go through due process second.
3) Him flatly stating up-front, without even trying, that he could never get National Reciprocity passed as part of a package of gun-law changes.
What did he say 2 and 3? Point me to the time stamps so I can see them in context;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QI6gT7zxXg