Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lqcincinnatus

Paterson is not ideal but Pee Bush is worse. Paterson will never be anything but land commissioner while Pee Bush will try to use the job as a steppingstone to become President. That’s why I voted for Paterson.


54 posted on 02/27/2018 11:12:16 PM PST by tschatski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tschatski; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
>> Paterson is not ideal but Pee Bush is worse. Paterson will never be anything but land commissioner while Pee Bush will try to use the job as a steppingstone to become President. That’s why I voted for Paterson. <<

Agreed. I remember FReepers making a similar argument to justify voting for Loretta Sanchez over Kamala Harris (Harris has national ambitions but Sanchez won't go beyond California, so we gotta hold our nose and vote for Sanchez)

It's safe to say that Sanchez is 20X worse than Patterson.

I have no qualms about supporting Patterson for a minor statewide office in Texas if it means ending George Pee's political career. Casting a vote for one of the obscure also-rans in the race won't accomplish that. We need Patterson to get more votes than George Pee.

55 posted on 02/28/2018 9:59:44 PM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson