But it goes beyond the pale to accuse rogue agents of being behind the school shootings. I doubt that Jim Robinson would support using his site to make such allegations.
>>I operate on the basis of provable facts. You cite non-existent evidence. And you make bizarre allegations that accuse rogue CIA/FBI agents of being behind the school shootings. Such allegations diminish all of us on this site. There is no doubt that based on existing facts, the leadership of the FBI and DOJ were engaged in corruption and deception threatening our electoral system and civil liberties. It is the biggest political scandal in our history.
But it goes beyond the pale to accuse rogue agents of being behind the school shootings. I doubt that Jim Robinson would support using his site to make such allegations.
**********************************************************
IMO, (and I do not mean this in any superior or condescending manner),you do have much to learn, kabar, more than I have the time and energy to address. Nevertheless, I will attempt to make a few points, and leave the rest.
You are again making conclusions based upon what you think I said. I did not “accuse”. I wondered, I suggested the possibility, but did not “accuse”. I am not in a position to accuse, only to wonder and suggest possibilities. There is a big difference there.
You think my thoughts serve to diminish you and whoever else you speak for on this site? Unlike you, I don’t profess to speak for all other Freepers, although there are others who share positions similar to mine. Please consider that others may think about your positions as you have expressed feeling about mine.
A person can’t get to the point of provable facts unless they entertain possibilities, which in turn, prompts research and discovery. There are numerous sites which explore and promote thought. I recall a time when on FR one could not criticize any Bush, yet now, years later, after new information has come forth, many hold differing views.
Some possibilities may seem bizarre to you, and I understand that. That happens to be my experience over the past decade. I did as you do, dismissing out of hand what I deemed “bizarre”. Yet years of reading, research, and thinking has caused me to check my rush to judgment, and in many instances, I have had to yield to a more informed position. This has brought me to today, now I initially check my inclination to judge or dismiss out of hand, do more in depth reading, and in many cases, reconsider initial impressions.
This experience is what forms the basis of my responses to you. If you are not at that point, that’s fine. But I encourage you to check judgmental pronouncements and do some additional research.
Thank you.