>
Am afraid you sorta ‘missed’ the point.
YES, only 200 out is unacceptable.
YES, 200 or more in is unacceptable.
BUT
We are better off with the 200 out rather than in and just make sure it grows from there.
You (somewhat) sound like the school that says ‘no sense drilling there, it will be 10 years before we see a drop of oil’
While very true, that was said 40 years ago and gets repeated every 5 or so years IF we had went against ‘antis’ 40 years ago we wouldn’t be having ALL the problems we have today.
EVEN ONE IS BETTER THAN NONE
>
Agree to disagree. Yet another (too many to frickin’ count) of govt, being govt, and bailing out the boat with a hole in bow.
You PLUG the leak (go after govt\biz for aiding/abetting...terminate the welfare state, fine and shut-down, make it HURT) and the criminals (IMO) will self-deport.
How much taxpayer $$$ was used to ‘flush out’ 200 head over a WEEK? What’s the avg. violator count (apprehended 2x, 5x, 20x)? Anything more than ONCE, it’s *not working*.
Turn off the spigot and stop pissing away the taxpayers’ property.
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
A journey of 1000 miles starts with ONE step.
Most ANYTHING is useless until they find a way to PLUG the hole on the borders.
Be it drones, land mines, Wall, Warthogs or a combination of all, as good as sending them out is, it is a lesson in futility if they are back in LA before the bus gets back to get another load.
Maybe fly them all to Mexico City will be a start. <: <:
Definitely need to step HARD on the hirers, get them off the dole and yes, they will go back voluntarily before they get on ‘the list’...
Remember ‘we’ are dealing with a Govt mindset that says they can’t easily roust out 20 mill illegals but going door to door to round up weapons is ‘simple’ (WELL the person that said it is simple surely is simple)
We are on the same page or at least the LAST PAGE.
Correct, also the fact that they are serving businesses is a great move. Turn employing illegal aliens into a big financial risk would be a terrific move.