Posted on 02/16/2018 1:38:56 PM PST by a little elbow grease
Mulehead.
No. He didn’t fail. He was NEVER interviewed for head of FBI. He couldn’t hold the job again.
This interview was specifically for Sp. Counsel.
Gorka is wrong on this. I like Seb, met him a couple of times. But he’s wrong on several things.
As Mulehead’s press release/RR said yesterday, no Trump person involved.
But, according to an article out today . . . Cankles can still be indicted.
hehehehe.
ROTFL!
Just to be pedantic about it, Mueller didn't say anything more than "here is a summary of the indictment, and the indictment."
Webpage for Special Counsel's Office
U.S. v. Internet Research Agency, et al (1:18-cr-32, District of Columbia)Rosenstein specifically reinforced that Mueller had no comment.A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment on Feb. 16, 2018, against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities accused of violating U.S. criminal laws in order to interfere with U.S. elections and political processes. The indictment charges all of the defendants with conspiracy to defraud the United States, three defendants with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and five defendants with aggravated identity theft.
There is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.DOJ Press Release 18-198 : Grand Jury Indicts Thirteen Russian Individuals and Three Russian Companies for Scheme to Interfere in the United States Political SystemThe Special Counsel's investigation is ongoing. There will be no comments from the Special Counsel at this time.
As for the substance, the press release by RR only speaks to THIS indictment. It does not represent a formal clearing of ANYBODY, and I don;t expect any such "clearing" statement to EVER be made.
The narrative is cast. The fact that the investigator didn't find enough evidence to bring charges, does not mean Trump did not collude with the Russians.
We are at a point in our political dialog where unsupported false accusation and innuendo can be more powerful than the truth. Power lies with whoever has the bigger megaphone. True/false does not regulate the public perception.
___
LOL..... I get it.
TheUnknown Patriot says:
February 17, 2018 at 10:23 am
The real question isn’t whether the DNC refused to let the FBI examine their servers. The real question is why didn’t the FBI WANT to investigate the servers?
The more texts I read from Page and Sztrok, the more I pondered this question. If FBI techs got to see the servers, of course they wouldn’t have found evidence of hacking by Russians. Did someone higher up at the FBI make the decision to keep their probably non-politicized techs from having access to those computers?
Questions I’d love to see asked of Comey, McCabe etc.
I find Mulehead to be feckless..... those indictments are for Russians who will NEVER be extradited
If I were Flynn I’d be asking to retract my guilty plea
Russians come here and do chaos. Why let them in?
Mueller must be strongly in favor of securing our borders and vetting foreigners.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.