Posted on 02/16/2018 10:24:19 AM PST by C19fan
Some 42,000 students attend UCLA, and whether many of them think “toxic masculinity” is a pressing concern is unclear, if the attendance at a recent campus forum on the subject is any indication. When the UCLA Intergroup Relations Program recently hosted an event to allow the campus community to discuss “toxic masculinity,” 10 students showed up.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecollegefix.com ...
All female?
I love toxic masculinity. [sigh]
They should have a seminar on toxic femininity. They can do it roughly once a month.
:)
If they were female, they probably looked male.
If they were male, they probably looked female.
They’ll just make it a required class for freshmen.
Probably fags, dykes or shemales. Or fugly women who couldnt get laid.
The first “fail” is to have an entity called “Intergroup Relations Forum”....
That name screams “Tedious Politically Correct B.S.”
This topic is so important we need to make attendance mandatory./src off/””
Don’t kid yourself. African administrators are appointed on every campus to force all faculty and staff to be insulted and denigrated by their phony diversity training. The entire program is overseen by shakedown lawyers that have co- opted most of what passes as higher education. The public has no idea how bad it really is.
How bout a seminar on the toxicity of queers, dykes, and other sex offenders. Focus on the males’ fecal obsession and the diseases they vector by the oral consumption route.
After watching an evening of figure skating from SK I’m waiting for the toxic LGBT group to meet.
Well, obviously, they must hold many more meetings on this crucially important topic to reach the maximum number of students possible.
I was on the UCLA campus a few months ago. There are very, very few white males at UCLA. A clear majority of the student population is female. I would say that at least two thirds of the students are females and/or of Asian or Pakistani origin. Instead of going to protests about toxic masculinity they go to class and spend a lot of time studying.
Toxic masculinity, toxic masculinity, blah blah blah, I keep hearing feminists use the phrase toxic masculinity.
So what about toxic femininity, why isn’t that term ever discussed?
Oh, wait, I think I know why we never hear the term toxic femininity ...
Because saying “toxic femininity” is ...
... redundant.
The correct term is freshperson! You Hater!
I don’t think they know what “in lieu of” means. Either that or I don’t.
We need photos of the 10 that showed up.
Just a guess, but giggly-puff and her pink-haired cohorts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.