Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LuvFreeRepublic
I'm reading it now, and notice the pejorative "interfere with election" being used instead of the more accurate "protected 1st amendment activity."

Mueller's legal theory is based on the risible fiction that "advocacy" and "interference" are synonymous; and further that "interference in an election" is a crime.

Given the dismal state of public education and the hackery that passes for government and press, Mueller's rhetoric will be accepted as a profound and righteous indictment; evidence that 17 government agencies were right on the money about "Russian collusion," etc.

Mueller is doing the typical "spread more mud" action that I come to expect from our overlords.

73 posted on 02/16/2018 10:43:37 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I was wondering about the 1st Amendment issue too. How many non citizens ‘interfered with our election’ and how much outside money poured into the US for groups to ‘interfere’ in our election. Mueller will go down in history, but not in a favorable way.
78 posted on 02/16/2018 10:52:54 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic ( #MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson