So common that it just naturally shows up in the pet food, got it.
So, as the article suggests, Smuckers is sourcing animal carcesses that are tainted with the drug. A reasonable Hypothesis. That just can not be, eh? Now, whether the soucing of said contaminated carcesses was with Smuckers knowledge remains to be seen. Whether they had knowledge or not, it sounds as though Smuckers has a problem.
I’m guessing you are a lawyer? What was the level mr. Lawyer. Has an outside lab found anything? How many times has this same issue been discussed for the last 30 years? Is there a shred of evidence-based science to suggest any adverse effects from this or arsenic, or a dozen other poisons, in the very same samples? What about the deadly carbon monoxide present in the very air you are breathing, right now? You are not much of a scientist, are you?