To: reaganaut1
So what is the legal standard time line for a speedy trial once charged?
Seems the courts are fragrantly negligent on defining that.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Youre right, their negligence stinks!
50 posted on
02/14/2018 9:40:57 AM PST by
Kickaha
(See the glory...of the royal scam)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So what is the legal standard time line for a speedy trial once charged?
Seems the courts are fragrantly negligent on defining that. TTBOMK, there isn't one. I seem to recall the Supreme Court basically said the right doesn't exist because (a) backlogged courts can't move quickly, and (b) because there's no telling how long a case might last there's no way to tell whether or not the trial wasn't speedy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson