Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise
This judge was critical of the intentional abuse and misrepresentations by those involved.

Of course, I haven't already read all the long documents linked in the CT site. From what's been said for weeks now, apparently the October 21, 2016 FISA warrant application was approved, but this makes it sound as if there was serious criticism from the judge.

But am I correct in assuming that this criticism was related to an October warrant application that was approved?

14 posted on 02/07/2018 5:34:01 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Will88

To the best of my knowledge, the 99 page opinion was critical of the FISC Title 1 warrant and the abuses resulting from it.


17 posted on 02/07/2018 5:35:53 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson