Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controversial Tech Detects Presence of Drugs In Drivers
NBC San Diego ^ | 2/7 | Wendy Fry

Posted on 02/07/2018 3:28:20 PM PST by nickcarraway

Use of the devices in criminal trials is fairly new and controversial.

New technology purchased by the San Diego Police Department to detect the presence of drugs including marijuana in drivers was used during a fatal hit-and-run investigation Saturday in Paradise Hills.

The Drager 5000 is a device that detects cannabis, cocaine, methadone, methamphetamine, prescription drugs and other controlled substances in drivers.

On Saturday night, a Paradise Hills couple was on their evening stroll a few yards from their home when a driver, who was allegedly high on drugs plowed up onto the sidewalk and ended the 67-year-old man’s life.

He also seriously injured a 55-year-old woman. Police say it’s unclear whether the woman will survive.

Neighbors tried to pull the driver’s Dodge truck off the injured man as the driver tried to run away but Good Samaritans chased him down until San Diego police arrived.

SDPD Officer John Perdue says the machine uses a swab sample from the mouth, which is put into the device and evaluated over the course of 8 minutes.

Police have been using the Drager 5000 at DUI checkpoints for about 10 months, but criminal defense attorney Vik Monder says the use of the devices in criminal trials is fairly new and controversial.

“It will not be able to tell the amount of the controlled substance and what that controlled substance is doing to that individual at the time of driving, so that’s going to be the real big issue for the prosecution,” Monder said.

Perdue thinks if prosecutions are successful the program could be expanded.

“I have a pending case right now coming up this month where I use this (Drager) on a traffic stop, so we’ll see how that one turns out,” he said.

Monder said one of the bigger legal issues is there is no legal limit on the amount of marijuana one can have in their system and drive. Perdue said the device does not quantify the level of a controlled substance that is in the system, but just whether or not one of the seven substance categories are present.

It prints out what looks like a receipt with different classes of drugs and says, for example, Methamphetamine: Present. Cocaine: Negative. THC: Present.

Police said after they use the Drager 5000 to arrest someone, that person is taken to the station to take a blood test as well.

Critics of the technology have expressed concern that THC remains in your system for up to 30 days so there’s no way to tell if someone is under the influence of the drug during a crash.

Also civil rights advocates question whether police are going to retain the saliva samples or DNA for any other investigative purposes.

SDPD previously provided its policy on operating the device when it announced the purchases. That policy showed officers would be discarding saliva samples after receiving results.

The San Diego Police Department Foundation purchased three Drager 5000s, which cost about $5,000 each. The equipment was purchased in anticipation of a possible increase in marijuana-related crashes with California's passage of legal recreational marijuana.

The Traffic Division said the investigation into the crash in Paradise Hills is ongoing and have not yet provided the names of the victims or the suspect.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: california; crime; drager5000; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2018 3:28:20 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can’t wait to see people getting busted for eating poppy seed rolls, oregano, salads, and for using Tylenol, Advil, and etc.


2 posted on 02/07/2018 3:31:34 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

DUI checkpoints aren’t controversial, but using this for evidence in a criminal trial is?
Beam me up, Scotty. No intelligent life here.


3 posted on 02/07/2018 3:32:17 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They really should have tested this guy. He's freaking out of his mind!


4 posted on 02/07/2018 3:33:43 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

My first thought too.

The next thought is that they will combine this w/civil asset forfeiture.

Fail test test, lose your car on the spot w/no hope of return.


5 posted on 02/07/2018 3:35:22 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why wasn't the suspect named?


6 posted on 02/07/2018 3:35:35 PM PST by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In terms of weed, THC stays in your blood for about a day or two. It remains in the body and detectable in the urine for much longer.

If you have a tolerance for THC, you can drive pretty well, it’s not going to affect you like alcohol will.

If you do not have tolerance for THC, let’s say you haven’t smoked for 6 months, and your buddy brings over the dank, and you take a few hits, you are going to be f*cked up and significantly impaired, and I do not recommend driving in this state at all. Don’t do it. Very difficult to pay attention and not get easily distracted by nothing at all.

Anyone who drives impaired under the influence of anything at all, tolerance or no tolerance, is putting others lives at great risk, and needs to go to prison.

Get loaded on whatever you like at your house, stay there, don’t drive, let someone else drive if you must leave.


7 posted on 02/07/2018 3:38:19 PM PST by chris37 (Take a week off racist >;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
They really should have tested this guy. He's freaking out of his mind!

He looks "high" to me!

8 posted on 02/07/2018 3:39:50 PM PST by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can’t find name of perp but his picture is here: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/public-safety/sd-me-paradise-fatal-20180203-story.html
It’s gotten so bad in San Diego I have almost totally quit driving. There are no rules anymore. Illegals road rage you, my wife got t-boned by a dreamer that ran through a four way when the lights were out...and then sued...cost us a new used $30,000 car...wife ran over some sort of industrial fan on freeway last week...it’s just sick what’s going on.


9 posted on 02/07/2018 3:42:54 PM PST by cabojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Gee, and I wonder why people don’t trust the cops?


10 posted on 02/07/2018 3:49:26 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chris37

“If you have a tolerance for THC, you can drive pretty well, it’s not going to affect you like alcohol will.”

Do you mean to state that you can’t have a tolerance for alcohol?


11 posted on 02/07/2018 3:50:17 PM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Reminds me of the cops who used a photocopy machine to print "He's lying" whenever their suspect answered a question.

Always insist on a blood test. Cops aren't analytical chemists.

12 posted on 02/07/2018 3:55:51 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=400>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

82% - 85% ACCURACY (as low as 60% for occasional users) will never withstand trial.

http://icadtsinternational.com/files/documents/2013_058.pdf

Especially with no legal standard in place.

It’s still incumbent upon the arresting officer to show impairment as a result of drugs. And, impairment alone is not enough for a legal violation...it has to be impairment as a result of drug use.


13 posted on 02/07/2018 3:56:21 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is one thing those drug pushing states are dying for. Push the dope and then pull ‘em over.

What a racket.


14 posted on 02/07/2018 3:57:04 PM PST by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

“Get loaded on whatever you like at your house, stay there, don’t drive, let someone else drive if you must leave.”

Absolutely.

There is also a whole different level of sobriety if you are walking home rather than driving.


15 posted on 02/07/2018 4:04:28 PM PST by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Or for having walked through a college dorm on the way to the car. I imagine second-hand pot smoke makes its way into your system.

And the magic machine makes no distinction between “just enough to register” and “Cheech and Chong’s van”.


16 posted on 02/07/2018 4:05:25 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

It’s been done before, lol. Enjoy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_4ULKpkLNc


17 posted on 02/07/2018 4:13:55 PM PST by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle

Yes, you can, but alcohol affects motor skills to a greater extent than THC.

My stepdad had a staggering tolerance for alcohol, but after 20 scotch and waters, he still fell out of the drivers seat and passed out upside down in the driveway after driving home.

Regardless of one’s level of tolerance for any drug, if one is driving and is determined to be impaired, one should go to prison. Tolerance of a substance is NOT a mitigating factor.


18 posted on 02/07/2018 4:21:59 PM PST by chris37 (Take a week off racist >;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

This is the natural progession of things after people started tolerating “safety checks”. Next: keep your left sleeve rolled up.


19 posted on 02/07/2018 4:28:41 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

I think it will be used as a “screening” test to determine whether to arrest someone. The actual testing to be used in a trial would take place after arrest at the police station or hospital.


20 posted on 02/07/2018 4:29:09 PM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson