Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

TAKE 2! This time with a working link.

Houston, we have a problem... If that's the case, we need to impeach a judge or two or three on the FISA court. Political documents with their known bias should not be considered as justification for a warrant by any judge.

1 posted on 02/06/2018 4:18:31 PM PST by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Rockitz

The FBI should be angry with the Democrats for lying and playing politics with the agency.


2 posted on 02/06/2018 4:20:18 PM PST by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Are Schiff’s eyes popping? If so, he’s lying, as usual.


3 posted on 02/06/2018 4:25:14 PM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

I don’t believe one word that comes out of Adam Schiff’s mouth.


4 posted on 02/06/2018 4:26:27 PM PST by Conserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

The phrase “political bias” is injected to pretend the FISA judge was aware that the Hillary campaign and the DNC PAID FOR the dossier.

It is a LIE!


5 posted on 02/06/2018 4:26:57 PM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

So is Schiffhead illegally leaking talking points from the RAT memo?


6 posted on 02/06/2018 4:29:29 PM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Schiff should be more clear on what he is saying and not saying.

Apparently, there was a footnote in the application to FISC that indicated Steele may have demonstrated political bias against Trump.

What the application did not say is that Trump’s political opponent paid Steele and/or Fusion GPS. By all accounts, that is a material omission.

I saw a great analogy today. How would the SEC view a statement made by a public company to the effect that it was having supply chain issues in South America, versus saying that Venezuela had nationalized the firm’s assets?

There are many ways to lie, which Schiff so amply demonstrates time and time again.


9 posted on 02/06/2018 4:32:28 PM PST by independentmind (Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
Houston, we have a problem...

Schiff went there. ...and publically accused the judge(s) of knowingly approving an fraudulent application.

Popcorn please.

10 posted on 02/06/2018 4:34:09 PM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
"The salacious video..."

What video is he talking about?

"I think the FISA court was made well aware..."

That's one of the problems, Schiff for brains, you don't think, you can't, without a functioning brain stem. And what you think the FISA court was made aware of, or not, is irrelevant. But, never mind, you know this already.

12 posted on 02/06/2018 4:36:54 PM PST by lonevoice (diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Right.

Had the court seen the obviously fabricated salacious passages, they may have been more inclined to regard the entire instrument as a politically motivated fabrication, which it was.


15 posted on 02/06/2018 4:48:42 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

The salacious parts go DIRECTLY to the credibility of the info. Cherry-picking select data can make ANY information seem “credible”.

Thank you Mr Schiff for confirming that the FBI did not present all the relevant info.


18 posted on 02/06/2018 4:57:40 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
Well let's get them thar FISA records on out here.
Let's see if this boy's bucket holds water or not. \spit/
20 posted on 02/06/2018 5:08:54 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
Image and video hosting by TinyPic



21 posted on 02/06/2018 5:10:11 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
I think the FISA court was made well aware of the potential political bias of those supporting Christopher Steele’s work,” he said.

There's your sign...

22 posted on 02/06/2018 5:11:02 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

“I think”................not they where but I think.


26 posted on 02/06/2018 5:14:40 PM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Yep.

a) Schiffhead is lying.
b) The FISA courts are totally corrupt.

If ‘b’ go to Special Counsel.


27 posted on 02/06/2018 5:17:26 PM PST by TigersEye (Where is the Trump/Russia collusion memo? ... Mueller? Mueller? Anybody?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Schiff sounds like a whiny dem poof.


29 posted on 02/06/2018 5:24:04 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of he Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

If the FISA court were nonpolitical they would have had a show cause hearing by now as to why the DOJ lawyers who got the Carter Page and other Trump team warrants from the court should not be held in contempt for committing fraud on the court. The longer they refuse to take contempt action against the DOJ lawyers, the more it becomes clear they knew about the phony dossier justification for the warrant and went ahead and ordered it anyway, which makes them complicit along with the DOJ lawyers in violating the FISA.


32 posted on 02/06/2018 5:54:29 PM PST by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
And there was corroboration of some of those very important elements,” Mr. Schiff, California Democrat, explained on CNN.

Only "some" of it?

On its face, that sounds like a clear admission that whoever attested under oath to the veracity of the evidence proffered for the FISC committed a felony.

33 posted on 02/06/2018 5:54:55 PM PST by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

This guy is Schniffing too much Whiteout. So the FISA court was told that the smears against Carter Page were cherry-picked from a politically biased “dossier” but the judge approved the request anyway? And he thinks that gives us comfort? This is the most pathetic attempt at “plausible reportability” I’ve ever seen. But you can be sure NPR will be crowing that Schiff has refuted the Memo with this inanity.


34 posted on 02/06/2018 6:37:18 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Now Schiff is pointing out the FISA court is crooked as a way to try to say the warrants were justified - not enough popcorn in the world for where this is going....


37 posted on 02/07/2018 3:56:57 AM PST by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson