Were the FISA judges complicit???????
Rooster head blurts out something worthy every once in a while.
Just the tip of the iceberg...the democrat allies in the media are embarrassing themselves due to the fact that they are oblivious to what else is coming down the pike.
“The Houses top investigator”
I don’t see Devin Nunes name in the article.
Shirley they can’t be talking about `Fauxhawk’.
The only Russia probe worth doing involves Hitlery, 0bama administration and their FBI goons. Spying scandal and uranium one.
Mueller was involved in uranium one, so he can’t do that one.
I am totally lost. Please forgive me but if the the FISA court was told who paid for the dossier would they have approved it? I would think not. So why the conversation about they could have told the FISA court that HRC and the DNC paid for it?
so there it is:
CRIMINAL
CRIME
MOTIVE
VICTIMS
but no one to enforce the law, certainly not the Federal Bureau of Injustice, they are far to busy conducting Dangerous Stings like Las Vegas Massacre or Bostom bombing
Nunes said he picked Gowdy to be the one who viewed source documents.
Only one member and one staffer could view the source documents from
which the memo was written.
I have dogged Gowdy often here.
However, Nunes picked the right man, with the unique skill set to view
and make notes from the original source documents.
In this task, he did much more than Kabuki Theatre.
It will be fun to watch when they all begin to turn on her.
Anyone hazarding a guess as to what Comey et al, are really thinking as they take all the flak that is required to protect her?
Hmmmm. This is what Swalwell and Schiff are talking about when they say the Judge knew the dossier was political motivated. Nunes said they were lying about the court being informed.
I want to know if they told the court that they were really investigating the Trump campaign. If I were the judge, I would have wanted to know that.
Trey Gowdy BUSTED/Jason Chaffetz Report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpOdSM7JN9k
4min 31sec
This was exactly what Gowdy said about Mueller in OCTOBER 2017.
One wonders if Gowdeys retirement from congress opens an avenue for a new, sadly needed, AG?
We have a very corrupt system that allows malfeasance to be covered up under the guise of national security. Given that those engaging in misconduct depend on the security classification system to protect themselves rather than the country, it is very difficult to expose them. It seems a rather clever strategy may be underway to force the information out.
By summarizing the misuse of the FISA warrant application process without including any documentary evidence, they put the opponents in the position of arguing about the absence of supporting evidence. The memo authors can now allow themselves to be forced into releasing the supporting information they wanted to release anyway. The old saying about being careful what you ask for because you might get it could be applicable here.
Next step is to declassify Mr McCabe’s testimony and ultimately the warrant application itself. Who knows where this will lead, but to be sure it is not going away.
Larry Schweikart
@LarrySchweikart
Just this one question, if answered, would require charges of gross criminal negligence against both Cankles and Zero:
“Did you, Cankles, get the Presidential Daily Brief on your unsecured server?”
Then ask
“When did this start?”
If before Benghazi, Zero himself is implicated
8:56 AM - Feb 4, 2018
https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/960150119952785409
Larry Schweikart
@LarrySchweikart
Just putting this out there:
1) The FOIA email from Huma to Cankles said that Cankles had the Presidential Daily Brief in her email (on the unclassified server???)
2) Zero was not an early riser. It is said he did not read the PDB untl 10:00 am to noon.
8:48 AM - Feb 4, 2018
https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/960148152073375744
Larry Schweikart
@LarrySchweikart
3) The PDB was normally generated by 8:00 am and distributed to the classified list—including Cankles
4) That means our enemies were reading Zero’s PDB two hours before he was, maybe four
5) I will leave you with this . . . .
Benghazi.
8:49 AM - Feb 4, 2018
https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/960148401311465472
All government crimes have Clinton stink on them.
Statistics will give the answer... It's how Lois Lerner was 'unmasked' - she WAS targeting Conservative Groups - - numbers told the truth. Trey Gowdy can get the numbers on FISA.
Were FISA Courts used almost exclusively to spy on conservative Americans during the Obama years? The public has the right to know.
To all of you Gowdy hating FRiends:
Some of you remind me of the same people who pronounce
their distain for Limbaugh during election season. I
am not so sure that their expectations are not a little
out of whack. In the case of Limbaugh he has a radio
show to do. His job is to defend conservatism not to
endorse a candidate in a primary. I know this because
I’ve listened since 1985.
As to Gowdy, what the hell kind of power do you think
he has? He tears apart libtard liars in Congressional
hearings but what else does he have the power to do
without the sayso from the House leadership. Can
he throw people in jail or hold a trial? I would
be happy to have somebody set me straight. Why should
we be happy to see Trey leave?