We may already be at the point where any defense attorney in a Federal trial can stand up and credibly tell the jury that any testimony or evidence from the FBI should be dismissed as false on its face.
Funny you raise that point. I was pondering this just the other day as well. I do think this will be a silver lining for a lot of folks in the Fed pens... if I were there I would certainly take advantage of the opportunity.
That isn't going to fly. The courts are going to protect their gravy train too, plus too much disruption. The courts will demand specific evidence of taint, and as McCabe's taint seems to be political, it won't reach very many cases.
Well, if that happens - WHY would it be due to the memo being released?
Would not ANY attorney now claim that the “department heads at the FBI” were “prejudiced” and “committed felonies against my client”?
If the memos and records were NOT released, you could claim ANY FBI interview or criminal proceeding was untainted!
But if the memo and records WERE released in full, THEN you can show that the corruption was limited to this single case against Trump. NOT against any other common criminal the democrats hate!
Now, true, I know Shiff is arguing the claim you just made. Yeah, yeah.
But HE is the one covering up the release of ANY incriminating evidence, while conspiring with Dianne Feinstein to release ALL of the Global Fusion testimony in the clear before ANY other witnesses were sworn in testimony. That allows EVERY other democrat and every other co-conspirator to know the exactly what has been said ahead of time.