Can you have obstruction without first proving that the person obstructing did something wrong, or believes he/she did something wrong?
If there is no collusion, and Trump believes there was no collusion, what was there for him to obstruct?
Doesn’t matter who he fired (as far as obstruction is concerned) if there was nothing to obstruct in the first place! Am I missing something?
Only risk is the perjury trap. Trump - do NOT meet with that slime unless they show their cards and evidence of criminality. (Especially then - don’t meet!)
This is out of control.