1)These wetbacks are already here and getting near full benefits in states like CA.
2)If chain migration is limited to the nuclear family it will be worth cutting a deal.
We can day dream about deporting them but the reality is that isn’t going to happen. So the options are cutting a deal on DACA or continuing an illegal program. The next Dem POTUS will just legalize all of them so it is in our interest to let POTUS make a deal here.
No deal.
Allowing the parents to stay is not an option.
They are the ones who are responsible for the “children” (who are mostly adults) being here.
2)If chain migration is limited to the nuclear family it will be worth cutting a deal.
_____________________________________________________
No, it won’t. It doesn’t address legislated end to birthright citizenship, allowing more anchor babies. This is the underlying element causing immigration havoc, and combined with chain migration, have put us where we are today. The only country with birthright citizenship. None of the countries supplying DACA aliens allows birthright citizenship like the U.S. does. Our immigration laws should be no less restricting than the laws of the illegal aliens countries of origin.
>
We can day dream about deporting them but the reality is that isn’t going to happen. So the options are cutting a deal on DACA or continuing an illegal program. The next Dem POTUS will just legalize all of them so it is in our interest to let POTUS make a deal here.
>
R-I-G-H-T. Fedzilla can’t handle the 800K (or whatever # it is), so why bother. No wonder the (R)N(C) can’t govern, it has supporters giving them the cover they need.
30M+...hat’s the excuse then? Why, as a Citizen, should *I* give a sh!t about ANY ‘law’?? It’s not enforced, or of matter, especially to the party in the majority (I expect no less of the minority).