Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All; reformedliberal; ransomnote
This is a MUST READ for all who haven't seen it and mostly for Q deniers. It is a post previously made by our very own BRILLIANT ReformedLiberal, Freeper of very high quality and brain power with an expertise in what she is talking about.

If after reading this, you can still ask, "Why not just tell us straight out?" then you haven't read this post. Combine this with ClearCaseGuys post on this thread and it's all you need to know.

______________________________________

From what I’ve gleaned from various boards/posts/interpretations, this is a Socratic teaching method designed to gently awaken the populace.

By asking targeted questions that are often clarified by following questions & sometimes statements, the listener/reader is challenged to think along different lines while the questioner/teacher doesn’t reveal classified intel or violate autonomy with brute force pedagogy.>p> It is an instance of connect-the-dots that appeals to people who love puzzles &/or who have _some_ information and need a nudge to get to the next level.

I’ve seen it explained that dropping this Swamp info in toto, without preparation, is considered to be so destabilizing as to be impossible. In fact, that fear of destabilization is one of the reasons the swamp things have survived intact for so long.

Stupid Hillary actually gave it away when she proclaimed that pursuing her for criminal actions would bring down the US system. Because of all the info already public, this did not serve to scare off the people who are on to her, but, instead galvanized them to dig deeper.

Blunt clarity (flat-out statements)delineate the target, which can then focus on irrelevancies and redirect the argument to nit-picks. Targeted questions arranged in logical order eventually make the researcher/listener focus on the form, which, IMO at this point in time, is fractal.

You see the same organization and the same players using the same format over and over from tiny 3-4 person/organization groups to overarching, global corporate/governmental constructs. The small group conspirators within the various governmental divisions follow the same patterns of hierarchy as something like the UN.

Q makes this obvious, but he/it doesn’t do it bombastically. The goal is make us think, direct the thought pathways and once a person does that, they own the information by virtue of having worked for it.

I’ve been fascinated by *conspiracy theory* and these *occult* (means hidden) organizations for decades. There are links and similarities throughout. They aim to influence diverse areas of human endeavor.

IMO, Q is on a global red-pill mission too vast for simple information transfers. Info dumps make the eyes glaze over. Connecting the dots yourself is active participation.

Once these methods and conclusions are seeded throughout the populace, they cannot be as easily countered through refocusing or loud screeching over single words or minor deviations.

By now, Q could disappear or be disappeared and even if a global coercive system was installed (likely one of the original swamp goals), the thought patterns of millions have already been altered and taken on a life of its own.

Q and whomever is behind it considers the people of the world as an active participant in the battle for its own freedom and survival. I’d say, provisionally, the Q posts and puzzles are a recruitment device.

One final thought: words mean things. Q presents with a huge vocabulary and word choice, while sometimes arcane (specialized)or seemingly obscure, is important. Q is actually extremely precise, while not didactic. Nuance is important in the communications because searching for implication stretches the mind and reveals further information.

You could use a dictionary and thesaurus to translate Q into common parlance and, in doing so, lose layers of information contained in the precise vocabulary.

71 posted on 1/19/2018, 7:54:55 AM by reformedliberal Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies

49 posted on 01/21/2018 8:16:05 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
I’ve seen it explained that dropping this Swamp info in toto, without preparation, is considered to be so destabilizing as to be impossible.

NONSENSE just show your cards and lets start making arrests. If 20% of the fed-gov ends up behind bars so be it. No one in the federal government can't be quickly replaced with someone better. This destabilizing nonsense sticks me as nothing more than teasers back up by nothing.

Qs lack of specifics has me wondering if all this is just troll bate.

114 posted on 01/21/2018 9:59:51 AM PST by usurper ( version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson