Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California AG: "We will prosecute" employers who violate sanctuary laws
WGMD ^ | 1/19/18 | Bradford Betz

Posted on 01/19/2018 2:44:55 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: markomalley

“Conflict of Laws” would seem to apply here.


41 posted on 01/19/2018 5:28:29 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A 10,000 dollar fine if you’re caught assisting duly costituted authority in enforcing the law. This is jumping the shark. It also happens to be sedition. This HAS to be addressed. If Trump doesn’t then a Militia should. Period. As it stands at this moment the fed Gov is losing control.


42 posted on 01/19/2018 5:34:18 AM PST by TalBlack (It's hard to shoot people when they are shooting back at you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; markomalley; All

>
Trump could be quite brutal here if he wished. He’s only got so much political capital however, and may have to escalate strategically.
>

Sorry, but talk about co-opting the Leftists drivel!

“Political capital”? It’s the Presidency, not ‘Dancing With the Stars’. The People don’t get to call it in, but every 4 yrs. He’s got a JOB to do: adhere and ENFORCE the F* L-A-W.

“Escalate strategically”? Ahh, for political posturing, not as ‘effective and legal governance’.

Nope, it only goes to show the dichotomy of govt: One sets of laws for the elected/elite....another, more draconian and brutal, for the rest.

>
Having mass uprisings in Leftyland will risk the mushy middle. It could also risk the USSC swing votes putting a finger to the wind.
>

And what would the mushy middle *DO*? What could SCOTUS do? Trump need only pull a Jackson on ‘em...let THEM enforce their edicts

Hell, I for one, would LOVE to see a true Constitutional crisis. Might wake a few out of their stupification.

My $.02, this is why the (R)N(C) loses, battle after battle. Poo-poo’d and tsk-tsk’d until they wake up wondering how the shackles happened upon their appendages.

I know I vote for some ‘finger-in-the-wind’.


43 posted on 01/19/2018 5:41:31 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

I think you’re quite right. Calif authority is banking on forcing Trump to use force in Calif and the people rising up aginst the Feds.


44 posted on 01/19/2018 5:43:40 AM PST by TalBlack (It's hard to shoot people when they are shooting back at you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

If I were the AG, there would have been Federal Agents there Arresting him on National TV, and the next glimpse of this sorry excuse for a human would be in an Orange Jumpsuit and Shackles.


45 posted on 01/19/2018 5:58:36 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Dear California Employers:

You are now between a proverbial rock and a hard place.

Refuse to comply with Federal immigration laws and the Feds will prosecute you.

Comply with them and California will prosecute you.

The obvious answer is: employers must LEAVE CALIFORNIA!


46 posted on 01/19/2018 7:20:16 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Definitely going to Supreme Court. A state has no say over immigration laws. Ca law is void on its face.
______________________
This matter will become known as Little Rock II. Orval Faubus learned this lesson, now a new batch of liberals need the same Federal 2X4 across their brow.


47 posted on 01/19/2018 7:22:30 AM PST by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This insane law is all sizzle and no steak. California is bluffing and they will lose the minute President Trump plays his hole card. The Dems in CA are propelling their state toward s—holeism at supersonic speed. Several US cities have earned the label s—tholes. CA is working tirelessly to be the first state to win the designation.


48 posted on 01/19/2018 7:27:35 AM PST by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I guess Califonia’s next step will be to fire on Fort Sumter...


49 posted on 01/19/2018 8:47:30 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Wouldn't California's laws be unconstitutional?

Don't they essentially violate the Supremacy Clause, which makes federal law superior to state law?

Not that Moonbeam, his AG Dos Equis, and the rest of La Raza Brigade of democrats give a damn about the Constitution, American Citizens and actual legal residents of the State of California.

50 posted on 01/19/2018 10:21:31 AM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Keep pushing ***holes


51 posted on 01/19/2018 3:50:41 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of he Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson